lolpee69 / email.txt

I am writing in response to the formal warning issued regarding the alleged "unwanted conversation" during the training session. After careful reflection, I believe there has been a misunderstanding that I would like to respectfully address. Key Clarifications: Timing of Conversation: The discussion in question occurred exclusively during a scheduled break period, not during active training hours. We were not interrupting any session or causing distraction to others. Nature of Discussion: This was a private, academic exchange about regional cultural differences between Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu—a topic raised purely for educational purposes. At no point did the conversation involve discriminatory remarks, offensive language, or unprofessional content. No Policy Violation: The Tata Code of Conduct encourages mutual understanding and respectful dialogue. Our break-time conversation aligned with these principles, as it was factual, non-polarizing, and unrelated to workplace matters. Request for Reconsideration: I kindly ask you to review the context and timing of this incident, as the warning implies a breach of discipline during the session itself, which did not occur. If the concern stems from the topic itself, I would appreciate guidance on what subjects are deemed inappropriate even during breaks, as this was not communicated earlier. My Commitment: While I firmly believe no violation occurred, I will adhere to any clarified guidelines regarding break-time discussions to avoid future misunderstandings. That said, I hope this warning can be reassessed in light of the above points. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this further in person or via call to resolve the matter fairly. Thank you for your time and understanding. Best regards, [Your Full Name] [Your Employee ID, if applicable] [Batch/Department Name]